Friday, November 13, 2009

Industry Pushes Chocolate Milk in Schools



By Emily Fredrix, Associated Press

MILWAUKEE — The creators of the "Got Milk?" campaign are getting ready to make a big push to keep chocolate milk on kids' minds and on school lunch menus, a plan that has some educators and obesity activists none too pleased.

The new ad campaign from the dairy industry, set to launch Monday, emphasizes that sugary flavorings are ways to get kids to drink milk. Without them, some youngsters won't drink regular milk and won't get its nutrients, the ads say.

The "Raise your hand for chocolate milk" campaign starts Monday with an ad in USA Today featuring chocolatey brown colors and the launch of a Web site that asks people to sign a petition declaring their support for chocolate milk in school.

But some educators and obesity experts say kids get enough calcium — essential for bone growth — and will drink white milk if it's the only milk offered. They say kids get too much sugar, which is heightening America's obesity problem, and schools shouldn't serve chocolate milk at all.

The idea behind the campaign is to draw a distinction between chocolate milk and the soda and candy that have come under attack in schools, said Vivien Godfrey, CEO of the Milk Processor Education Program, the industry marketing group that developed the campaign with the National Dairy Council. Godfrey said the effort will cost between $500,000 and $1 million.

She said most kids choose chocolate milk, but without it they drink juice, soda or water, which don't have the same nutrients. The facts — that chocolate milk does have nutrients — are getting lost in the debate over school lunches, she said.

"If there's even a chance chocolate milk might get taken out of schools, that really can do more harm than good," she said.

It's not clear how many schools have chocolate milk or are pulling it. But parents and school districts are becoming increasingly concerned and asking for more information, said Margie Saidel, a vice president with Chartwells School Dining Services, which manages food programs in 600 districts and supports chocolate milk.

But experts like Marlene Schwartz, deputy directory of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University, want chocolate milk tossed. She said kids have too much sugar already and chocolate milk has no place in schools.

Dairy products are a common source of added sugar in children's diets, so that's why parents and educators consider removing them, she said. But the research does not point to any calcium shortages when chocolate milk is removed in schools.

"I don't believe children are going to go on a thirst strike and refuse to drink anything," she said.

Kids happily drink white milk — now the only offering at the Boulder Valley School District in Boulder, Colo., said Ann Cooper, the school's director of nutrition services, who calls herself the "renegade lunch lady" for her efforts to promote more nutrition in school lunches.

She estimates that the extra calories from chocolate milk — as much as 40 or 60 calories on top of a typical 110 calorie 8-ounce serving of white milk — could add up to 5 pounds of weight gain over the 180-day school year. That's why the district no longer offers chocolate milk.

Chocolate milk does have its defenders, even among nutritionists.

"It's better to get the milk in with a little bit of sugary flavoring than have them pick almost any alternative," said Connie Weaver, head of the department of Food and Nutrition at Purdue University and a spokeswoman for the American Society for Nutrition. She has received research funding over the years from the dairy industry, but not on chocolate milk, she said.

A student petition got a Barrington, Ill., distrcit to compromise on its chocolate milk ban.

A soon-to-be fifth-grader, 10-year-old Haley Morris drafted her own petition in support of flavored milk and got about 70 signatures.

Superintendent Tom Leonard decided on a compromise: "Flavored milk Fridays" where the district offers chocolate or strawberry milk one day a week. The district is testing the program through January to see if kids drink more milk the days flavors are offered.

"All of my friends and I, we just wanted chocolate milk back to drink because we like chocolate milk better than white," Morris said.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Doctors Concerned About Obesity Irked By Physician Group's Grant from Coca-Cola



By Kaye Spector, The Cleveland Plain Dealer
November 10, 2009, 9:50AM

CLEVELAND -- Caldwell B. Esselstyn Jr., the longtime Cleveland Clinic surgeon who lectures around the world and counsels people regarding the health benefits of a plant-based diet, was among 22 U.S. scientists and physicians who recently signed an open letter of opposition to the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Their beef? The AAFP announced in October that it accepted a six-figure grant from the Coca-Cola Co. to create content about beverages and sweeteners for the academy's consumer Web site, FamilyDoctor.org.

The AAFP said its first-ever "consumer alliance" would enable the academy to develop educational materials and "incorporate the products [consumers] love into a balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle." The new content is expected to launch in January.

The partnership created a stir among some physicians, nutritionists and health experts. Many saw the arrangement as a threat to the 62-year-old academy's commitment to science and family medicine.

Among the critics, in addition to Esselstyn's group, are the Center for Science in the Public Interest and nutrition authority Marion Nestle.

Soda and other sweetened beverages are the No. 1 source of added sugars in the U.S. diet, the American Heart Association says, and many health experts blame the drinks, at least in part, for the soaring U.S. obesity rate. A 12-ounce can of soda can contain up to 10 teaspoons of sugar.

"The AAFP's Web site should be criticizing sugar-sweetened beverages in the strongest language and providing candid, objective advice about the health and safety questions related to diet drinks," the letter sent by Esselstyn's group says. "But with Coca-Cola providing the funding, the AAFP simply cannot do that."

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Week 12 Agenda


New Orleans Shrimp Pot Pie from Sunny Anderson's Cooking for Real (Food Network, USA)

M 11.9
Read: KC—pg. 36-74
In-Class: Book discussion; Presentations
Journal 5 Prompt: Do the foods you eat say anything about your social standing? For example, can a correlation be made between the types of foods you eat and your income level, access to health care, and education? Using “Chewing the Fat: Alton Brown on Race, Class, and Food” from Serious Eats (eR) as a basis, explore the theory that your diet is a reflection of your socio-economic standing.
Due: Journal 5
Catering Group 2: Salad

W 11.11
NO CLASS—Veterans Day

UPCOMING:
Week 13
M 11.16
Read: KC—pg. 75-218
In-Class: Watch—Waitress (2007)

W 11.18
Read: KC—pg. 219-250
In-Class: Book discussion; Presentations