Saturday, September 12, 2009

Study: Low Self-esteem Leads to Obesity


Children with self-esteem problems are more likely to be obese as adults, a research team has found.

BBC News, Friday, 11 September 2009 03:07 UK

A study of 6,500 participants in the 1970 British Birth Cohort Study found that 10-year-olds with lower self esteem tended to be fatter as adults.

The effect was particularly true for girls, researchers from King's College London reported.

One obesity expert said the results highlighted that early intervention was key to tackling obesity.

The children had their weight and height measured by a nurse at the age of 10 and they self-reported when they were 30.

Their emotional states were also noted, the researchers reported in the journal BMC Medicine.

Children with a lower self-esteem, those who felt less in control of their lives, and those who worried often were more likely to gain weight over the next 20 years, the results showed.

Professor David Collier, who led the research, said: "What's novel about this study is that obesity has been regarded as a medical metabolic disorder - what we've found is that emotional problems are a risk factor for obesity.

"This is not about people with deep psychological problems, all the anxiety and low self-esteem were within the normal range."

Strategies

Another researcher, Andrew Ternouth, said: "While we cannot say that childhood emotional problems cause obesity in later life, we can certainly say they play a role, along with factors such as parental weight, diet and exercise.

"Strategies to promote the social and emotional aspects of learning, including the promotion of self-esteem, are central to a number of recent policy initiatives.

"Our findings suggest that approaches of this kind may carry positive benefits for physical health as well as for other aspects of children's development."

Dr Ian Campbell, of the charity, Weight Concern, said: "This study presents some disturbing evidence that, as we suspected, childhood psychological issues have an influence on future weight gain and health.

"Many of the adults we work with have identifiable underlying emotional and self esteem issues and are often resistant to treatment.

"The message here is that early intervention, in childhood, can be the key to combating adult obesity.

"That requires much more than health practitioners can deliver alone and needs greater alertness from parents, teachers, and anyone involved in the welfare of children."

Thursday, September 10, 2009

The Cupcake Bubble


Better enjoy that vanilla cupcake with espresso-ganache icing today. This sugar rush is going to end with a crash.

By Daniel Gross, Newsweek
Aug 14, 2009 | Updated: 5:46 p.m. ET Sep 3, 2009

In recent years, the response to a popped economic bubble has been to create a new one. The pierced dot-com/telecommunications bubble paved the way for the housing/credit bubble. That punctured bubble may be giving way to an alternative energy bubble. But I've got my eyes on a smaller, but no less revealing, one: the Cupcake Bubble.

The current recession, which started in late 2007, laid the groundwork for the recent proliferation of cupcake stores in American cities. Lots of people know how to make really tasty cupcakes, which are simple products with cheap basic ingredients. Baking cupcakes doesn't require a large amount of capital investment, and it's relatively easy to scale up without hiring lots of workers. It takes about as much labor to produce three dozen cupcakes as it does to make one dozen. Meanwhile, storefronts in heavily trafficked areas became cheaper with the decimation of local retail. And so in the past year, casual baking has turned into an urban industry.

The trend started, as most trends do, in Los Angeles and New York. In Los Angeles, Sprinkles, which bills itself as the first cupcake bakery, has expanded from its base in Beverly Hills to five locations in California, Texas, and Arizona—with 16 more outlets in the works. Crumbs, started six years ago on Manhattan's Upper West Side, is up to nearly two dozen locations: five in Los Angeles, and 18 in chi-chi zones of the New York metro area—New Canaan, Conn.; Westfield, N.J.; East Hampton, N.Y.—with three more on the way. Magnolia Bakery, immortalized in Sex and the City, has three locations in Manhattan. Washington, D.C., is getting in on the act, too. As the Washington Post notes, "at least half a dozen cupcake bakeries have opened around Washington in the past 20 months, and more are on the way," with Georgetown Cupcake and Red Velvet out front.

The cupcakeries are succeeding for a few reasons. They're peddling a product that is simple, obvious, and generally affordable. Most of the new joints charge about $3 for a cupcake. And they're certainly a useful rebuke to Starbucks, whose industrialized baked goods are barely edible. (I suspect that the coffee chain's practice of placing sausage and egg muffins in the glass cases and letting them sit there all day must depress sales of the adjacent muffins and scones.) And yet I'm suspicious of the cupcake trend for historical, financial, and, ultimately, gastronomic reasons.

In America, bubbles form because any good business idea gets funded a dozen times over. That's the American way. Cupcakes are now showing every sign of going through the bubble cycle. The first-movers get buzz and revenues, gain critical mass, and start to expand rapidly. This inspires less-well-capitalized second- and third-movers, who believe there's room enough for them, and encourages established firms in a related industry to jump in. In New York, the Crumbs is joined by a cupcake truck, Sweet Revenge, Babycakes, and Sugar Sweet Sunshine. The Post notes that in D.C., "established bakers such as CakeLove, Just Cakes, Furin's, Best Buns and Baked & Wired are all in on the act." Operating in what is essentially a commodity market, newcomers try to distinguish themselves by offering twists on the familiar formula. Hello Cupcake, conveniently located near Slate's D.C. office, specializes in organic, seasonal, and local ingredients. Babycakes offers vegan cupcakes. Coming soon to a precious storefront in a gentrifying neighborhood of Brooklyn: sustainable cupcakes made of flour ground from organic wheat raised in Prospect Park, served in wrappers recycled from old copies of the New York Review of Books.

I'm suspicious of the durability of the cupcake boomlet on economic grounds, too. One colleague says the cupcakes are "sort of the baked equivalent of Bush's tax cuts." Why? "Their economic rationale withstands any and all conditions. When the economy is going well, people can afford little extras like cupcakes. When the economy isn't going well, people can afford only cupcakes." Indeed, they are being pitched as affordable luxuries. In an age when discretionary, feel-good spending is at a nadir, cupcake bakeries are trying to persuade people to trade up from cheaper sugar-delivery vehicles (such as, say, a doughnut). It's telling, to me, that the Crumbs that just opened in Westport, Conn., is in the back of a Tiffany's that opened a few years ago. With employment rising and wages under pressure, the larger trend is for consumers to trade down—not up.

What's more, cupcakes aren't so cheap. With tax, many of these cupcakes run close to $4 a pop. Pair a high-end cupcake with a coffee and your snack costs the equivalent of a satisfying sandwich. Crucially, the sugar rush that $4 buys lasts only as long as it takes to walk back to the office. By contrast, an expensive latte can keep office drones humming for the whole afternoon. And while cupcakes doubtless offer good margins, a baker has to sell a lot of them to make real money. That will surely tempt many entrepreneurs to start mass production. But the minute you start baking at a central location and trucking to the goods over long distances, the value proposition inherent in the product can grow stale, as Krispy Kreme found.

The real problem, though, is that the cupcakes are essentially reactionary. In the last few years, as the dread foodie virus has spread, right-thinking Americans have been forced to become experts about a wider range of products: coffee, cured ham, cheese, and, most recently, chocolate. Chocolate has become more sophisticated, and, hence, more complex and less sweet. Urban chocolatiers have fled from the soothing milk chocolate of our youths to dark, bitter, confections combined with spices and chili peppers. Cupcakes, by contrast, are willfully uncomplex, familiar, and comforting, as the menus of Magnolia and Sprinkles show. But as reactionaries often do, they've gone too far. I've tried a bunch of these new cupcakes and find them to be way too sweet—sugar on top of sugar. This morning, a colleague came in with a dozen small cupcakes from Crumbs, each sweeter than the last. A diabetic would have gone into shock simply looking at the package.

Cupcakes are having their moment, no question, and many could make sweet profits. But remember what always happens after a sugar rush: a crash.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Court: McD Can't Claim a McNopoly on Its Prefix


By After an eight-year legal battle, Malaysia's highest court has ruled that the McCurry chicken restaurant is not infringing on McDonald's copyright by using a "Mc" in its name.

"I am very relieved now. All my prayers have been answered ... now, I can look forward to the future," A.M.S.P. Suppiah, owner of the modest Indian curry shop in Kuala Lumpur, tells the New Straits Times.

Suppiah says he started his fast-food restaurant in 1999 and took the name, according to his website, from the words "Malaysian chicken curry," a house specialty.

The court ruled that there was no evidence showing that the curry joint was trying to pass itself off as part of the McDonald's empire.

It is hardly the first such loss for the American giant. Inc. magazine reports that McDonald's attempt once to sue a Jamaican restaurant also called McDonald's backfired.

Instead of cracking down on the curried-goat and jerk-chicken eatery, the court forced Mickey D to operate under the name "Golden Arches" for five months, the magazine says.

Monday, September 7, 2009

PowerPoint Presentation Schedule: Section 60



Here is the schedule for section 60's presentations. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) are too broad and must be narrowed. Submit a new or more focused topic as soon as possible.

Likewise, if you are not on this list, I need a topic by Thursday the 10th. If I do not receive a topic from you, one will be assigned.

Completed presentations are in bold.

Week 4

M 9.14
1. Ritt C (Beer: Ales v. Lagers)
2. David P. (Fast Food Addictions)
3. Max S. (Home Cooking vs. Eating Out)

Week 5
W 9.23
1. Jeffrey N. (A Look at Illegal Foods)
2. Sharon S. (Everything You Need to Know About Vegemite)
3. Jeff G. (The African Bushmeat Crisis)

Week 8
M 10.12
1. Joey A. (The Detrimental Effects of Candy on Young Children)
2. Brian J. (History of Pizza in America)

Week 10
M 10.26
1. Khoi N. (Chocolate: The Positive and Negative Effects)
2. Leyzer C. (History of Pasta)

W 10.28
1. Andreas Z. (The Do's and Don'ts of Carving a Turkey)
2. Chris N. (How Brie is Made)

Week 11
M 11.2
1. Cassie M. (Everything You Need to Know About Tortillas)
2. Edgar A. (The History of Tacos)
3. Colleen G. (Chef Profile: Julia Child)

Week 12
M 11.9
1. Holland M. (Caffine and Gaming)
2. Alexandra H. (How to Go Vegetarian)
3. Brendan R. (Children and Fast Food)
Week 13
W 11.18
1. Mary P. (Soft Drink Nutritional Dangers)
2. Linda C. (Exploring Traditional Green Teas)
3. Krista M. (The Effects of Portion Sizes)

Week 14
M 11.23
1. Amanda N. (How to Pick the Perfect Wine Accompaniment)
2. Caitlin A. (Inside the Crab Industry)
3. Angelique S. (Eat This, Not That)

PowerPoint Presentation Schedule: Section 5



Here is the schedule for section 5's presentations. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) are too broad and must be narrowed. Submit a new or more focused topic as soon as possible.

Likewise, if you are not on this list, I need a topic by Thursday the 10th. If I do not receive a topic from you, one will be assigned.

Week 4
M 9.14
1. Van T. (The Most Popular Types of Rice Americans Eat)
2. Andrew D. (Fatal Foods)
3. Davon Y. (The Art of Chocolate)

Week 5
W 9.23
1. Christian B. (Made in California: In-N-Out Burger, Wahoo's Fish Taco, and Jamba Juice)
2. John S. (Cuts of Beef Demystified)
3. Matt M. (Different Types of BBQ)*

Week 8
M 10.12
1. Jonathan I. (The History of Chewing Gum)
2. Cristina J. (Food and the Five Senses)
3. Dominic H. (Coffee vs. Energy Drinks)

Week 10
M 10.26
1. Danny C. (Coffee in the Age of Starbucks)
2. Edward C. (Maize in Africa)

W 10.28
1. Miguel J. (The Slow Food Movement)
2. Vicky C. (Everything You Need to Know About Oreos)
3. Bernadette F. (The Basics of Food Safety)

Week 11
M 11.2
1. Mikell Z. (Five Great Food Cities)
2. Vanessa V. (Three Food Trends: Freeganism, Local Food, and Urban Foraging)
3. Teresa D. (Making Smart Choices When Eating Out)

Week 12
M 11.9
1. Kayla H. (The Art of Brewing a Cup of Coffee)
2. Peggy C. (Exploring the Cuisines of China)
3. Steven M. (The Art of Sushi Preparation)

Week 13
W 11.18
1. David K. (Understanding Food Fears)
2. Eva L. (Ice Cream vs. Frozen Yogurt)
3. Jose L. (Food in Music)

Week 14
M 11.23
1. Michelle R. (Foreign Food Customs)
2. Anibal A. (The History of Mole)
3. Alexandria R. (The American Beef Industry)

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Essence of Toad? Amphibian Found in Diet Pepsi


Unsavory Additions to Many Foods Not Uncommon

By Radha Chitale, ABC News

Sept. 5, 2009 — Ready to grill dinner recently for himself and his wife, Fred DeNegri, 55, popped a can of Diet Pepsi to sip while he cooked. But one swig of the cola was enough to put him off his meal.

"At the time, I asked him and he couldn't even describe [the taste]," said Fred's wife, Amy DeNegri, 54, of Ormond Beach, Fla. "He said, 'I've never tasted anything so awful in my life.'"

Dumping the liquid, the couple said, they discovered a small animal macerating in the can. Testing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirmed that the animal was either a frog or a toad, although the agency found no connection to the Pepsi plant where the soda was bottled.

"I would have been throwing up," Amy DeNegri said, if she had been the one drinking the soda.

While the DeNegri's amphibian-infused soda sounds like the stuff of urban legends, in reality, such transgressions can occur. And while these incidents may not occur often or pose significant health risks, the ick factor can be through the roof.

"What's a challenge with this is that lots of bottling plants and lots of processing plants have rather frequent problems with animals getting into their production facility," said Jaydee Hanson, a policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety in Washington, D.C. "This is one of many examples of why you need a quality control system that works virtually all the time."

Value-Meal Deal (Breaker)
A Virginia woman made headlines in 2000 for finding a whole, fried chicken head in a box of McDonald's chicken wings. Another woman from California was dining at McCormick and Schmick's, a seafood chain, when she found a condom in her clam chowder.

Gastronomic flukes can cause significant emotional distress, but they rarely result in poor health consequences. Cola, for example, is too acidic to support most harmful bacteria.

"With soda, it's low pH, it's carbonated, and kills most pathogens to be concerned about, so there's not much of a [health] risk," said Chuck Gerba, a microbiologist at the University of Arizona.

Indeed, there is greater risk associated with poor food preparation, or from fresh foods that are stored where insects and rodents can access them compared with highly processed foods.

A Frog in Your Drink Can Be Emotionally Distressing
"The pattern that people need to worry about is in food products where pathogens are introduced into food when you're not expecting them," said Hanson, citing incidents where salmonella and E. coli have been found in peanuts and spinach, respectively. "They're happening way more frequently than the odd frog in the Pepsi can."

Amy DeNegri said the first thing she did after discovering the frog or toad was to contact poison control but that her husband had no resulting health problems from drinking the contaminated Diet Pepsi.

"Mentally, yes," DeNegri said. "Other than that, no."

Chocolate Covered ... Insects?
Unsavory additions to some foods are a widely accepted fact, however. The FDA allows a certain amount of foreign contaminants in many foods. For example, chocolate may contain up to 60 insect fragments and one rodent hair per 100 gram sample.

The FDA guidelines for food defects exist primarily for natural, plant-based foods where exposure to insects and rodents is a normal byproduct of how the food is cultivated, stored and processed.

"They're rare but there's always a certain amount of risk involved, and I think you just have to go with that," said Keith-Thomas Ayoob, director of the nutrition clinic at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City. "Anytime there's human involvement, a factory is involved, once in a while there's going to be an [incident]."

But no such allowable levels for insect, rodent or other kind of contaminant exist for soft drinks, said FDA spokesman Michael Herndon.

Between Aug. 4 and Aug. 11, the FDA inspected the bottling plant in Orlando, Fla., where DeNegri's Pepsi came from and found no objectionable conditions and no evidence that might associate the plant with the problem, such as frogs or toads in the building.

FDA Has No Leads on Where the Frog or Toad Came From
Siobhan Delancy, a spokeswoman for the FDA, said investigators have not concluded how DeNegris' Diet Pepsi came to be contaminated.

The Pepsi Bottling Co. stood by its production facilities and said a breach in quality control was unlikely.

"There was nothing in the FDA test results that conclude that this was a manufacturing issue," said Jeff Dhanke, director of public relations for the Pepsi Bottling Group. "We have confidence that this is virtually impossible to have happened in a production environment. The well-being of our consumers -- there's nothing more important than that."

Amy DeNegri said she and her husband want an apology and some form of compensation from Pepsi, which they have not gotten and they are now seeking legal advice.

Week 3 Agenda


Caramel Apple Pie from Tyler Florence's Tyler's Ultimate (Food Network, USA)

Week 3
M 9.7
NO CLASS—Labor Day

W 9.9 Read: OD—pg. 123-225; CR—“Chocolat Mousseux: The Exonerated Buzz” by Taras Grescoe, “Care for Something Saucy?” by Robert Sietsema
In-Class: Diagnostic essay

UPCOMING:

Week 4

M 9.14
Read: OD—pg. 226-286; CR—“My Best Meal Ever” by Bryan Miller, “Remembrance of Tacos Past” by Mark Dery, “Picky Eater” by Julia Alvarez, “Who Needs Vegetables Anyway?” by Matt Marion
In-Class: Essay discussion; Presentations

W 9.16
Read: OD—pg. 287-333; CR—“Fat's What I'm Talking About” by Tim Carman, “College Cooks Gone Wild” by Margot Kaminski, “Pie (In The Name of Love)” by Vincent Rossmeier
In-Class: Lecture—“Food on Film: Ratatouille, When Harry Met Sally…, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, Like Water for Chocolate, Chocolat, and others”
Journal 2 Prompt: Often, dishes tell the story of a family history better than anything else. Whether it’s grandma's cookie recipe or the Thanksgiving dinner tradition no one can remember having started, food plays an integral role in defining who we are as families. Using This American Life’s episode entitled “You Gonna Eat That?” (eR; choose “Full Episode” to hear) as a basis, write about a significant food-related family experience or tradition.
Due: Journal 2