Sunday, November 1, 2009

Economy Doesn't Kill Appetite for Premium Foods



By Carol Lloyd, San Francisco Chronicle
November 1, 2009

Have you been to the San Francisco Ferry Building lately?

The economy may have many consumers in a stranglehold, but you'd never know it at ground zero for Bay Area food culture. Folks are still lining up to nibble on Scharffen Berger's Asante single origin chocolate ($7), to guzzle Blue Bottle's New Orleans iced coffee ($3), and to stock up on 7-ounce bottles of Stonehouse blood orange olive oil ($14).

I know, I know. You may not indulge in such edible extravagances. But before the boom expanded our grocery budget and the luxury food business stepped up to fulfill our every desire, how many of us indulged in gourmet vittles at all? Now many Bay Area residents are addicted to at least some level of gastronomic indulgence: If not coffee then tea, if not pomegranates then pine nuts, if not shiitakes then organic sausage.

Indeed, numbers support the idea that foodies (and we know the Bay Area has a lot of them) aren't willing to do without. According to consumer research firm Packaged Facts, sales of gourmet, specialty and premium foods and beverages have been growing at much faster rates than those of the overall food and beverage industry for the past five years.

In a recent Harris Poll (funded by Whole Foods), 51 percent reported eating dinner at home more often, but 76 percent said they were not willing to compromise on food quality, regardless of prices. Recent research by the National Association for the Specialty Food Trade found that consumers in the western United States are 13 percent more likely to buy specialty foods than the rest of the country.

Curious about how a new economic reality - 2.2 million unemployed people in California - has changed the market for gourmet foods, I began grilling Ferry Building merchants amid their impatient, hungry clientele (how long do you have to wait for a muffuletta, I ask you?). The response was unanimous: The bust had changed buying patterns, but not profit margins.

John Smit, owner of Hidden Star Orchards, purveyor of apples, grapes and delectable fresh squeezed juices, has noticed that though restaurant orders have declined, orders by small specialty grocers like Bi-Rite have more than made up the loss. "It's balanced out," he says.

Jacky Recchiuti, co-owner of Recchiuti Confections, echoed this sentiment. While big orders for parties and weddings had dropped, sales from individuals buying for their own consumption seem just as strong if not stronger than before. "There are fewer people," she said. "But those that come seem to buy more."

An assistant manager at Scharffen Berger (the other cacao den down the hall) speculated that the resilience of the high-end chocolate market is in fact a side effect of our new austerity: "I think people will luxuriate in a chocolate bar when they no longer let themselves go to restaurants."

Indeed, the gourmet product market seems to be surviving the restaurant industry's dark days - and even benefiting from them. (In a recent Bay Area survey by Zagat, 52 percent of responders reported that they were eating out less because of the slow economy.) A clerk at Stonehouse Olive Oil told me that sales have improved because people are cooking more.

If people were no longer buying the $5 T-shirts from Mervyns (which filed for Chapter 11 in July 2008), how could they afford $5 bars of chocolate?

"We've definitely cut back in all areas of spending except for food," said Adam Gard of Oakland, speaking for most locals queried in my random (albeit unscientific) survey about their food shopping habits. "It's the small daily pleasures that make the other sacrifices easier to handle. ... It's not cheap on the pocketbook, but we view it as an investment in our health along with our spirit ... the spirit that thrives on tasty edibles."

Many offered details about how their expensive purchases somehow managed to save them money. "The one area I absolutely will not compromise on is food," explained Holly Hansen, adding that she splurges regularly on free-range chickens for $20 each bought directly from a rancher. "They are worth every penny, and I can get at least two meals for my family of four out of them, because they go further and just taste so much better than some mass-produced chicken."

In a sense, food culture seems to be toughing it through economic times because it's not just about dollars and calories. In the Bay Area, food has become the presiding metaphor for a consciously led life: pleasure, politics, identity and love for family all wrapped up in one. And that's one reason why staying home for the holidays may not be cheap, but it's almost guaranteed to be tasty.

Week 11 Agenda


Chicken Tikka from Anjum Anand's Indian Food Made Easy (BBC Two, UK)

Week 11
M 11.2
Read: CR—“The Mixing of the Greens” by Louis P. DeGouy, “Macaroni and Lots of Cheese” by Julia Moskin
In-Class: Presentations; Lecture—“How to Write a Process Essay”
Due: Persuasive essay

W 11.4
Read: KC—pg. 3-35
In-Class: Process essay
Catering Group 1: Appetizer

UPCOMING:
WEEK 12
M 11.9
Read: KC—pg. 36-74
In-Class: Book discussion; Presentations
Journal 5 Prompt: Do the foods you eat say anything about your social standing? For example, can a correlation be made between the types of foods you eat and your income level, access to health care, and education? Using “Chewing the Fat: Alton Brown on Race, Class, and Food” from Serious Eats (eR) as a basis, explore the theory that your diet is a reflection of your socio-economic standing.
Due: Journal 5
Catering Group 2: Salad

W 11.11
NO CLASS—Veterans Day

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Extra Credit: Serving a Six-Course Dinner Catering Groups, Sec. 5



Here are the catering group assignments for the final six weeks of class. Again, in order to earn up to 15 pts. extra credit, you and your partner(s) will create one course of a six-course meal.
Rules:
  • Meals must be at least 75% homemade, 25% store-bought
  • Courses must be enough to feed 20-25 people
  • Not all partners must cook, but all partners must contribute equally
  • You must submit a recipe for your meal (these will be compiled on our website at semester's end)
  • Please do not feel the need to spend a lot of money. This will be more challenging for some groups than others, so instead, think of creative ways to keep costs to a minimum.

I have decided that this six-course meal will be French-themed. Therefore, each course should draw from the amazing cuisines of France for inspiration.

Bon Appetit!

At this point, poor Vanessa is all alone for dessert. So if you would like to help her out, sign up in the comments section below.

M 11.2 Appetizer Course:
Mikell Z.
Dominic H.

M 11.9 Salad Course:
Christian B.
Vicky C.

W 11.18
Soup Course:
Bernadette F.
Daniel C.

M 11.23
Main Course:

Jose L.
Teresa D.


M 11.30
Cheese Course:
Michelle R.
Kayla H.

M 12.7
Dessert Course:
Vanessa V.

Monday, October 26, 2009

FYI: Sec 5 RE: Extar-Credit


I still only have eight students willing to do extra credit. I need at least four more before we can proceed. If you are interested, sign up ASAP. If not enough people sign-up, I'll have to cancel the whole thing.

Here is who is already on board:

Vicky C.
Bernadette F.
Daniel C.
Mikell Z.
Dominic H.
Michelle R.
Kayla H.
Vanessa V.

To sign-up, go to the Comment section below.

CLASS CANCELED MONDAY 10/26

Very sorry for the late notice. See you (hopefully) Wednesday.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Week 10 Agenda


Chocolate Mocha Cake from Ellie Krieger's Healthy Appetite (Food Network, USA)

Week 10
M10.26
Read: CR—“Out of the Kitchen, Onto the Couch” by Michael Pollan, “On Cooking—I Don’t Know and I Don’t Care” by “candylover”
In-Class: Essay discussion; Writer's Workshop
Due: Persuasive essay (Draft 1; bring three copies);

W10.28
Read: CR—“Growing Pains” by Tama Murphy, “Thursday, September 12, 2002” by Julie Powell, “Mistakes Were Made” by Lessley Anderson
In-Class: Essay discussion; Presentations
Due: Persuasive essay (Final draft)

UPCOMING:
Week 11
M 11.2
Read: CR—“The Mixing of the Greens” by Louis P. DeGouy, “Macaroni and Lots of Cheese” by Julia Moskin
In-Class: Presentations; Lecture—“How to Write a Process Essay”

W 11.4
Read: KC—pg. 3-35
In-Class: Process essay

Friday, October 23, 2009

Supplemental: Persuasive Essay



The Modes of Persuasion
In 350 BCE, Aristotle's On Rhetoric identified what he considered to be the three basic components of successful appeal.

Logos: Logos is an appeal based upon logic. The idea is that you are more likely to convince people of your position if it is framed in a reasonable manner. In other words, people are most attracted to those ideas that are clearly explained, logically constructed, and based in facts.

Pathos: Pathos is an appeal based upon emotion. People are more likely to be persuaded if base emotions are appealed to. Keep in mind, that the emotions tapped need not be positive. One can be persuaded by feelings of anger or anxiety, just as easily as feelings of warmth or optimism.

Ethos: Ethos is the appeal based upon the credibility of the speaker. This appeal touches on the element of trust. If one trusts the character, motives, and expertise of the person making the appeal, then he or she is more likely to be persuaded.

Fallacies of Logic
These are arguments containing errors in reason. They are extremely common and often very effective. However, the point here is not for you to use these in your argument, but to be able to point them out in opposing points of view.


AD HOMINEM: The Ad Hominem attack will focus on the person, not the argument.

Example: You can't take health advice from her, all she eats is junk food!

RED HERRING: A Red Herring is the introduction of an irrelevant subject, usually introduced in an attempt to drive the argument away (or distract) from its original subject.

Example: Why are we debating a soda tax when it's really Starbucks we need to reign in?

BURDEN OF PROOF: This is the tactic of shifting the Burden of Proof onto the wrong party. One party clearly has the responsibility to prove or dispove something, but instead shifts that responsibility to the opposing party.

Example: Of course, America has the best restaurants in the world. Prove to me they don't.

GOLDEN MEAN: The Golden Mean fallacy assumes that given two opposing viewpoints, the correct solution is invariably the middle or "golden mean." This fallacy is based upon the common belief that neither of two diametrically opposed viewpoints can possibly be correct.

Example: This recipe says to use four cups of flour, while another says to use six. I’ll play it safe and use five cups instead.

SLIPPERY SLOPE: The Slippery Slope fallacy is based on the idea that once you take the first step down a path, you will be inexorably drawn down that path until you reach an inevitable and very bad end. In other words, if “X” is allowed to happen, then “Y” is sure to be the end result.

Example: Calorie counts on restaurant menus will only lead to government mandates telling us what and what not to eat.

STRAW MAN: A Straw Man is a misrepresentation of the opposing view, setup in such a way that it is easy to demolish. At worst, it is a complete fabrication which bears no resemblance whatsoever to the original argument.

Example: Vegetarians and vegans make such a big fuss about eating meat because, at the end of the day, all they want is the destruction of capitalism.

LOADED QUESTION: A Loaded Question presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all involved. It is posed in such a way that a person, no matter what answer he/she responds with, will inevitably commit him/herself to some presupposed claim.

Example: Are you still a food snob?

BANDWAGON: The Bandwagon is a fallacy in which a threat of rejection by one's peers (or peer pressure) is substituted for evidence in an argument.

Examples: Americans need to join the rest of the industrialized world and eat smaller portions of food at meals. If they can do it, then why can't we?

GUILT BY ASSOCIATION: Guilt by Association draws its power from the fact that people do not like to be associated with people they dislike. If it is shown that a person shares a belief with people he or she dislikes, then one might be influenced into rejecting that belief.

Examples: It's interesting that you enjoy the food at McDonald's. I don't; my food tastes have evolved.

Advertisements
Watch the following ads and look for examples of the modes of persuasion. What are you trying to be persuaded into? Are fallacies of logic used? If so, how?